Propaganda is the Weapon…Destruction of America the Goal

Freedom 01

It is appropriate that it was President Obama that made propaganda legal in America since 1948. Yes, thanks to President Obama the American government can lie to the citizens. Using propaganda normal is being portrayed as abnormal while deviants and perverts are the new normal. Do you believe a man and woman should be what makes a marriage? Then you are the deviant and anti-whatever. Yes, queer marriage is the normal and believing is should be a man and woman make you abnormal. Do you believe a swinging dick and couple of balls make that person a man? Well now you are anti-something and a deviant. Yes, that pervert in drag is now the normal you not accepting “it” make you abnormal.

This is all being done through propaganda in TV shows, movies, newspapers, news programs and government policies. Watch older TV shows. You can see when the pro-homosexual agenda began. Before then homosexuals were portrayed and perverts and degenerates. Then they became neutral and finally just a positive friendly person. You are and will see the same thing happening with any cause of the elites. Transvestites and pedophiles will soon be positive characters on TV and in movies. The only real failure they have has is gun control.

I believe their failure with gun control is people actually know and are familiar with guns. Their other targets are more abstract less familiar to people. It is easier to change opinion on subject the target is not personally familiar.

Through the use of propaganda and forced immigration, their goal is to destroy Western Civilization and the freedom it champions. The Elites goal is an earth filled with ignorant citizens living in third-world conditions while they enjoy first world living in luxury. Their goal is a world of serfs serving their needs.

If You Hate Obamacare Just Wait for Obamatrade

 

“If you like your freedom of speech, you can keep your freedom of speech.”
Seems we have heard something like that before.

The infamous Trans Pacific Partnership or TPP is one-step closer but it still has to pass Congress.

From Common Dreams:

The “disastrous” pro-corporate trade deal finalized Monday could kill the Internet as we know it, campaigners are warning, as they vow to keep up the fight against the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement between the U.S. and 11 Pacific Rim nations.

“Internet users around the world should be very concerned about this ultra-secret pact,” said OpenMedia’s digital rights specialist Meghan Sali. “What we’re talking about here is global Internet censorship. It will criminalize our online activities, censor the Web, and cost everyday users money. This deal would never pass with the whole world watching—that’s why they’ve negotiated it in total secrecy.”

 

Groups Issue Warning: Pro-Corporate TPP Could Kill the Internet | Common Dreams | Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community

The “disastrous” pro-corporate trade deal finalized Monday could kill the Internet as we know it, campaigners are warning, as they vow to keep up the fight against the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement between the U.S. and 11 Pacific Rim nations.

Source: www.commondreams.org/news/2015/10/06/groups-issue-warning-pro-corporate-tpp-could-kill-internet

 

 

Electronic Frontier Foundation’s (EFF) Maira Sutton wrote on Monday, “We have no reason to believe that the TPP has improved much at all from the last leaked version released in August, and we won’t know until the U.S. Trade Representative releases the text. So as long as it contains a retroactive 20-year copyright term extension, bans on circumventing DRM, massively disproportionate punishments for copyright infringement, and rules that criminalize investigative journalists and whistleblowers, we have to do everything we can to stop this agreement from getting signed, ratified, and put into force.”

Furthermore, “The fact that close to 800 million Internet users’ rights to free expression, privacy, and access to knowledge online hinged upon the outcome of squabbles over trade rules on cars and milk is precisely why digital policy consideration[s] do not belong in trade agreements,”Sutton added, referring to the auto and dairy tariff provisions that reportedly held up the talks.

“Successive leaks of the TPP have demonstrated that unless you are a big business sector, the [U.S. Trade Representative, or USTR] simply doesn’t care what you have to say,” wrote EFF’s Jeremy Malcolm.

 

New TPP Leaked Text Reveals Countries’ Weakening Resistance to Copyright Maximalist Proposals | Electronic Frontier Foundation

When we wrote about the intermediary liability provisions in a reported May 2015 leak of the Intellectual Property chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) last month, we hadn’t actually seen the text.

Source: www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/08/new-tpp-leaked-text-reveals-weakening-resistance-maximalist-proposals

 

 

 

 

 
Rules that will criminalize investigative journalists and whistleblowers.

 

Cyber-Espionage and Trade Agreements: An Ill-Fitting and Dangerous Combination | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Yesterday’s leak of a May 2014 draft of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement revealed the addition of new text criminalizing the misuse of trade secrets through “computer systems”, as mentioned in our previous post about the leak.

Source: www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/cyber-espionage-and-trade-agreements-ill-fitting-and-dangerous-combination

 

 

Christian vs Muslim

 

No, I am not holding some gladiatorial death match. On the surface, we hear there is little difference between the two, just a different paths but equal. I am examining one aspect of difference in the two religions.

On just the simple act of lying, we see an immense difference.

Christians in the Ten Commandments are told, “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” This is interpreted to mean, “You must not lie.” Pretty cut and dried.

Muslims in the Quran, Hadith and Islamic Law do not get the same command.

First from the Quran:

Qur’an (16:106) – Establishes that there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.

Qur’an (3:28) – This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to “guard themselves” against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim may appear friendly to non-Muslims, though they should not feel that way.

Qur’an (9:3) – “…Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters…” The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.

Qur’an (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.

Qur’an (2:225) – “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts” The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

Qur’an (3:54) – “And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.” The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means ‘deceit’. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same.

Next from the Hadith:
For those not familiar the Hadith are collections of the reports purporting to quote what the Islamic prophet Muhammad said verbatim on any matter. The term comes from the Arabic meaning “report,” “account” or “narrative.” Hadiths are second only to the Quran in developing Islamic jurisprudence, and as regarded important tools for understanding the Quran and commentaries (tafsir) on it.

Bukhari (52:269) – “The Prophet said, ‘War is deceit.'” The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad’s men after he “guaranteed” them safe passage (see Additional Notes below).

Bukhari (49:857) – “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.

Bukhari (84:64-65) – Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an “enemy.”

Muslim (32:6303) – “…he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).”

Bukhari (50:369) – Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka’b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad’s insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka’b’s trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.

And from Islamic Law:

Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 – 8.2) – “Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory… it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression…

“One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie.

Lastly:

Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. The two forms are:

Taqiyya – Saying something that isn’t true.
The Islamic doctrine of taqiyya permits Muslims to actively deceive non-Muslims, above and beyond the context of “self-preservation.”

Kitman – Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills “it shall be as if he had killed all mankind”) while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of “corruption” and “mischief.”

Immigration News the Media Refuses to Report

 

Minneapolis Police report a ten year-old girl was raped by a Somali immigrant. Ahmed Hersi Abdi charged with two counts of first-degree criminal sexual assault for the attack. Ahmed Hersi Abdi is a Somali Muslim.

The mainstream news failed to report he is an immigrant and Muslim.

 

Muslim refugee charged with raping 10-year-old girl

A Free Press For A Free People Since 1997

Source: www.wnd.com/2015/10/muslim-refugee-charged-with-raping-10-year-old-girl/

 

 

In Germany a 20-year-old woman known as “Rokstan M was found murdered. She was gang-raped in Syria and immigrated to Germany two years ago. She was a victim of an “honor killing” since her family wanted her dead. German police believe her father and brothers slaughtered her with knives and buried her body in a garden, allegedly at the instruction of her mother.

I bet you never heard this story on CNN or any other mainstream news shows.

Our governments are allowing unvetted people with drastically different cultures and beliefs to immigrate. These people have no desire and will never recognize or agree our views and way of life.

 

Honor Killing: Syrian Gang Rape Survivor Murdered in Germany

The horrifying story of an “honor killing” in Germany spotlights the madness of importing millions of unvetted, unassimilated migrants.

Source: www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/10/07/honor-killing-syrian-gang-rape-survivor-murdered-germany/

 

 

Make No Mistake They are Coming

 

The liberal gun control agenda is not about any common sense (or whatever other buzzword is being used) reform but rather it is directly about confiscating and then outlawing almost all gun ownership in the country.

Make no mistake, when outlets like Salon and Slate call for Australian gun control in America they are calling for gun confiscation under the threat of government coercion and conflict as well as openly admitting that they are willing to risk an all-out civil war in order to achieve this agenda.

 

The Push For Full Disarmament of America Has Begun: “Outright Gun Ban and Mass Confiscation Once and For All”

They want to make it a felony to posses any handgun or “assault” rifle.

Source: www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/the-push-for-full-disarmament-of-america-has-begun-outright-gun-ban-and-mass-confiscation-once-and-for-all_10072015

 

 

The Myth there are Moderate Muslims

Before I continue let me say I am certain there are moderate Muslims in America. Those “moderate Muslims” in America, would not survive their practice in the Middle East. Much like the American Catholic, that ate meat on Fridays. The American “moderate Muslim” is someone who cannot recite a minimum of five surahs, hasn’t been to a mosque in months or years, whose wife doesn’t wear hajib and who doesn’t not have a beard or fear Mohammad. They do not practice the Koran as strictly written and may be in danger of an Islamic re-tuning.

I’m not sure what to make of the numbers below. Some scare the hell out of me. Like question nine.

9. Should Muslims in the U.S. have their own courts or tribunals in America to apply shariah law or should they be subject to American laws and courts?

39% AMERICAN COURTS ONLY
36% BE FREE TO CHOOSE EITHER
15% SHARIAH COURTS ONLY

Over half believe they should have or have access to shariah courts. To be blunt that is un-American. It has no place in American society. Most questions are answered with at least twenty percent of the answers being counter to American culture and society.

There is a generic Muslim idea and a word called “taqiyah” representing the notion in Islam that Muslims should never tell the truth to infidels. You and me, Western Civilization, those not believing in Islam, we are the infidels. The unclean. The ones who, like the Borg, need to be converted or killed.

The Center for Security Policy released a second installment of the results of a national poll conducted in the last two weeks on various topics relevant to U.S. national and homeland security.

The Questions and Answers –

1. Are you…
5% MALE
45% FEMALE

2. To ensure that we have a representative sample, into which of the following categories does your age fall?
20% 18-24
30% 25-34
20% 35-44
18% 45-54
7% 55-64
5% 65+

3. Are you. . . .?
100% MUSLIM
Non-Muslims were excluded from the survey.

4. To confirm, you are a Muslim living in the United States?
100% YES

5. In which of the following states do you reside? (grouped according to U.S. Census categories)
24% NORTHEAST (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT, NJ, NY, PA)
20% MIDWEST (IN, IL, MI, OH, WI, IA, KS, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD)
34% SOUTH (DE, DC, FL, GA, MD, NC, SC, VA, WV, AL, KY, MS, TN, AR, LA, OK,
22% WEST (AZ, CO ID, NM, MT, UT, NV, WY, AK, CA, HI, OR, WA, TX)
Now we have identified the respondents let us move on the meat questions.

SHARIAH

6. How do you characterize shariah?

47% A GUIDE TO THE PERSONAL PRACTICE OF ISLAM
25% A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM GOVERNING ALL ASPECTS OF THE FAITHFUL MUSLIM’S LIFE
11% THE MUSLIM GOD ALLAH’S LAW THAT MUSLIMS MUST FOLLOW AND IMPOSE WORLDWIDE VIA JIHAD
12% DON’T KNOW
4% NO ANSWER

7. With respect to shariah, do you believe that

45% IT IS UP TO THE INDIVIDUAL MUSLIM TO DEFINE SHARIAH
26% THERE IS ONLY ONE TRUE SHARIAH AS INTERPRETED BY ISLAMIC AUTHORITIES AND NO FAITHFUL MUSLIM CAN DEPART FROM IT
13% MUSLIMS WHO DO NOT FOLLOW SHARIAH ARE NOT FAITHFUL MUSLIMS
10% DON’T KNOW
6% NO ANSWER

8. If shariah conflicts with the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which law should be considered supreme?

43% THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS
33% SHARIAH
17% DON’T KNOW
8% NO ANSWER

9. Should Muslims in the U.S. have their own courts or tribunals in America to apply shariah law or should they be subject to American laws and courts?

39% AMERICAN COURTS ONLY
36% BE FREE TO CHOOSE EITHER
15% SHARIAH COURTS ONLY
7% DON’T KNOW
3% NO ANSWER

10. “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

51% TOTAL AGREE (NET)
23% STRONGLY AGREE
28% SOMEWHAT AGREE
32% TOTAL DISAGREE (NET)
13% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE
19% STRONGLY DISAGREE
17% DO NOT KNOW/CANNOT JUDGE

11. “Shariah as interpreted by Islamic authorities is compatible with the U.S. Constitution, including freedom of speech and other rights.”

60% TOTAL AGREE (NET)
31% STRONGLY AGREE
30% SOMEWHAT AGREE
21% TOTAL DISAGREE (NET)
12% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE
9% STRONGLY DISAGREE
19% DO NOT KNOW/CANNOT JUDGE

12. “I believe that violence against those that insult the prophet Muhammad, the Qur’an, or Islamic faith is sometimes acceptable.”

29% TOTAL AGREE (NET)
16% STRONGLY AGREE
13% SOMEWHAT AGREE
61% TOTAL DISAGREE (NET)
14% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE
47% STRONGLY DISAGREE
10% DO NOT KNOW/CANNOT JUDGE

13. “Violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”

25% TOTAL AGREE (NET)
13% STRONGLY AGREE
12% SOMEWHAT AGREE
64% TOTAL DISAGREE (NET)
9% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE
55% STRONGLY DISAGREE
11% DO NOT KNOW/CANNOT JUDGE

JIHAD

14. Which of the following comes closest to your understanding of the term “jihad”?

51% MUSLIMS’ PEACEFUL, PERSONAL STRUGGLE TO BE MORE RELIGIOUS
16% VIOLENT HOLY WAR AGAINST UNBELIEVERS OF ISLAM
11% NON-VIOLENT ACTIONS BY MUSLIMS TO UNDERMINE NON-MUSLIM STATES AND PEOPLES
18% DO NOT KNOW/CANNOT JUDGE
4% REFUSED

15. Do you believe that jihad is an obligation of your practice of Islam?

41% YES
41% NO
13% DON’T KNOW
6% NO ANSWER

16. Do you think that there are violent jihadists in the United States?

54% YES
15% NO
28% DON’T KNOW
3% NO ANSWER

17. Do you think the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make shariah the law of the land in this country?

19% YES
66% NO
11% DON’T KNOW
4% NO ANSWER

18. Do you believe that it is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed?

24% YES
60% NO
11% DON’T KNOW
5% NO ANSWER

19. How familiar are you with the group in Iraq and Syria that calls itself the Islamic State?

49% TOTAL VERY/SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR (NET)
25% VERY FAMILIAR
24% SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR
43% TOTAL JUST A LITTLE BIT/NOT AT ALL FAMILIAR (NET)
21% JUST A LITTLE BIT FAMILIAR
23% NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL
6% DON’T KNOW/NOT SURE
2% NO ANSWER

20. Based on your understanding of Islam, which of the following best describes the beliefs of the Islamic State?

43% THEIR BELIEFS ARE UN-ISLAMIC
29% THEIR BELIEFS ARE ISLAMIC, BUT AN INCORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE FAITH
9% THEIR BELIEFS ARE CORRECT AND CONSISTENT WITH SHARIAH
14% DO NOT KNOW/NOT SURE
4% NO ANSWER

21. How familiar are you with al Qaeda?

56% TOTAL VERY/SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR (NET)
26% VERY FAMILIAR
30% SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR
37% TOTAL JUST A LITTLE BIT/NOT AT ALL FAMILIAR (NET)
19% JUST A LITTLE BIT FAMILIAR
18% NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL
5% DON’T KNOW/NOT SURE
2% NO ANSWER

22. Based on your understanding of Islam, which of the following best describes the beliefs of al Queda?

49% THEIR BELIEFS ARE UN-ISLAMIC
25% THEIR BELIEFS ARE ISLAMIC, BUT AN INCORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE FAITH
8% THEIR BELIEFS ARE CORRECT AND CONSISTENT WITH SHARIAH
14% DO NOT KNOW/NOT SURE
3% NO ANSWER

23. How familiar are you with the Muslim Brotherhood?

49% TOTAL VERY/SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR (NET)
25% VERY FAMILIAR
24% SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR
42% TOTAL JUST A LITTLE BIT/NOT AT ALL FAMILIAR (NET)
18% JUST A LITTLE BIT FAMILIAR
24% NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL
7% DON’T KNOW/NOT SURE
2% NO ANSWER

24. Based on your understanding of Islam, which of the following best describes the beliefs of the Muslim Brotherhood?

23% THEIR BELIEFS ARE ISLAMIC, BUT AN INCORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE FAITH
22% THEIR BELIEFS ARE UN-ISLAMIC
18% THEIR BELIEFS ARE CORRECT AND CONSISTENT WITH SHARIAH
34% DO NOT KNOW/NOT SURE
3% NO ANSWER

25. In your opinion, is the Muslim Brotherhood present in the United States?

36% YES
16% NO
44% DON’T KNOW
3% NO ANSWER

26. Which of the following statements best describes your view

24% THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IS AN ORGANIZATION COMMITTED TO USING ONLY NON-VIOLENT MEANS TO ACHIEVE THE TRIUMPH OF ISLAM AROUND THE WORLD
16% THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
15% THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IS ENGAGED IN JIHAD, WHICH IS NOT TERRORISM BUT A LEGITIMATE DUTY OF FAITHFUL MUSLIMS
40% DON’T KNOW
5% NO ANSWER

27. Do you believe the Muslim Brotherhood in America accurately represent your views?

25% YES
37% NO
33% DON’T KNOW
5% NO ANSWER

28. Do you believe the Muslim Brotherhood are legitimate leaders of the Muslim community in America?

27% YES
40% NO
30% DON’T KNOW
3% NO ANSWER

DEMOGRAPHICS
Finally, a few demographic questions, for statistical purposes only…

29. Which of the following best describes your racial background? (ROTATE)

32% CAUCASIAN OR WHITE
24% AFRICAN-AMERICAN OR BLACK
20% ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER
16% MIDDLE EASTERN
3% HISPANIC OR LATINO
2% NATIVE AMERICAN

3% MULTI-RACIAL OR OTHER, SPECIFIED (NET)
1% DECLINE TO STATE

30. Would you consider yourself to be an observant Muslim, or not?

67% YES
13% NO
17% DO NOT KNOW/NOT SURE
3% DECLINE TO STATE

31. Are you Shi’a [SHE-uh], Sunni [SUE-knee], or another tradition?

41% SUNNI
39% MUSLIM, NON SPECIFIC
13% SHI’A
2% ANOTHER TRADITION, SPECIFIED
5% DECLINE TO STATE

32. Are you registered to vote in the state that you currently live, registered to vote in a different state,

or not registered at all?

76% REGISTERED TO VOTE IN CURRENT STATE

24% TOTAL NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE IN CURRENT STATE (NET)

21% NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE

3% REGISTERED IN A DIFFERENT STATE

33. Thinking for a moment about your social, economic, and political views…Do you consider yourself to be a conservative, moderate or liberal…?

29% TOTAL CONSERVATIVE (NET)
15% VERY CONSERVATIVE
15% SOMEWHAT CONSERVATIVE
35% MODERATE
23% TOTAL LIBERAL (NET)
12% SOMEWHAT LIBERAL
11% VERY LIBERAL
2% LIBERTARIAN
11% DO NOT KNOW/REFUSED (DO NOT READ)

34. In politics today, do you consider yourself to be a…Republican, Independent or Democrat?

19% TOTAL REPUBLICAN (NET)
3% TEA PARTY REPUBLICAN
6% STRONG REPUBLICAN
5% NOT-SO-STRONG REPUBLICAN
6% INDEPENDENT LEANING REPUBLICAN
19% INDEPENDENT
48% TOTAL DEMOCRAT (NET)
9% INDEPENDENT LEANING DEMOCRAT
8% NOT-SO-STRONG DEMOCRAT
27% STRONG DEMOCRAT
5% PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT
3% OTHER (DO NOT READ)
8% DO NOT KNOW (DO NOT READ)
3% REFUSED (DO NOT READ)

Monsanto Merchant of Death

Monsanto ‘Deliberately Covered Up Data’ Proving Glyphosate is Cancerous for 4 Decades

Some well-respected researchers are now saying that Monsanto demanded incriminating data and reports be sealed and locked away from public scrutiny as proprietary trade secrets, though they knew these documents would reveal glyphosate’s carcinogenic nature.

The EPA continually colludes with Monsanto to present glyphosate as ‘safe’ to the public, but during an exclusive interview on the Progressive Radio Network on September 4, Anthony Samsel stated that Monsanto used an industry trick to dismiss evidence about glyphosate’s risks in its own research. “Monsanto misrepresented the data,” says Samsel, “and deliberately covered up data to bring the product [glyphosate] to market.”

Monsanto’s Sealed Documents Reveal the Truth behind Roundup’s Toxicological Dangers -Richard Gale and Gary Null – Progressive Radio Network

Source: prn.fm/monsantos-sealed-documents-reveal-the-truth-behind-roundups-toxicological-dangers-richard-gale-and-gary-null/

 

 

What information is hiding in Monsanto’s sealed documents?

Among the many cancers and diseases associated with glyphosate are:

Adenoma cancer in the pituitary gland
Glioma tumors in the brain
Reticular cell sarcomas in the heart
Malignant tumors in the lungs
Salivary mandibular reticular cell carcinoma
Metastatic sarcomas of the lymph gland
Prostate carcinoma
Cancer of the bladder
Thyroid carcinoma
Adrenal reticulum cell sarcomas
Cortical adenomas
Basal cell squamous skin tumors

Yet these were all hidden from public view. I doubt that hundreds of billions of dollars would come close to account for the 40 years of health damage Monsanto has potentially caused by hiding this information. The question becomes with politicians so far in Monsanto’s pocket…Will Monsanto pay?

Global Warming the Lies Continue

Afternoons in Texas used to be much hotter prior to 1960. You can see why Climate Fraudsters start their graphs at the 1970s. Needing to prove “global warming” the National Climatic Data Center decided to chart Maximum Temperature Anomaly in Texas. To prove the climate was warming. The good news is they now have the facts to prove global warming; the bad news is all their data is false. The figures needed to be corrected from the actual temperature readings. Below are two charts the first showing the actual temperatures and the second showing the temperatures after the necessary corrections had been made. Funny how you get two opposites outcomes.

Warming 01